Today's top fighters (ie the promised rank) - Wykop.pl
close the site uses cookies to deliver services in accordance with the Policy Files Cookies. You can specify the conditions for storage or access cookies on your browser. Wykop.pl excavation (422) Best Microblog
Fulfill this promise made some time ago. I assure you that I have tried to be as objective as possible, although I know that is not the end I succeeded.
Vogels VLB 500 - Speaker bracket - Warsaw Price 79.00 zł
@ Rudy2007: I recently bought on a F-22 but the most difficult to maintain and indeed is difficult to use and I returned pocket fighters to the proven F-16 and we strongly recommend it to everyone, pocket fighters especially well-suited pocket fighters August in urban conditions. # Show comment Koller 1 year 10 months ago 72
@ Koller: why? After all, they are so beautiful on fire .. # show comment g ... t 1 year 10 months ago 4 I recently bought on a F-22 but the most difficult to maintain and indeed is difficult to use and I returned to the proven F-16 and I strongly recommend it to everyone, especially well-suited August in urban conditions. @ Tusk: a lot of smoke? # Show comment b ...... and 1 year 10 months ago 34
@ Tusk: I have tested the F-22, but I definitely prefer my old su-27. Although the equipment smacks of some Soviet inaccuracy but it can take the whole family and even microwave is an invaluable aid for longer trips. # Show comment tusk 1 year 10 months ago via Android 2
@ Duffman: No just the F-22 is not a family tool to spread democracy and it made me reject most of it, and of even these problems in the rain. # Show comment YAZZoo 1 year 10 months ago -2
What this statement at all makes the T-50 since it is what showed Ruthenian arms industry to show a flying mock-up? pocket fighters For this flying scrap yet not developed yet even engines, avionics or weapons? Nay, even the hull is in the demo. If you voted for the bombastic announcements of delusions is Ruthenian generals that Russia was the first power in the world :) And yes dig, because cool pictures. # Show comment CanisLupusLupus 1 year 10 months ago 74
@ SuperZaxon: After I wrote that on the list got on credit. :) And really, I examined each aircraft based on a little bragging manufacturers, pocket fighters pilots, commanders ... Well, after I had the opportunity to fly to every several pocket fighters combat missions. # Show comment Navona 1 year 10 months ago 4
@ CanisLupusLupus: I was looking for the entrance to refuel, but somehow pocket fighters I did not associate :) And what is fueling when the infusion is out of view of the pilot? With the tank too much can not be seen. # Show comment m ........ 1 1 year 10 months ago via iOS 0
@ CanisLupusLupus: interesting question arises in the case of construction of the Chinese. Airforce magazine - theoretically, of course - as it assesses the structure of phenomenal aerodynamic properties, probably much better than the solutions American or Russian. # Show comment CanisLupusLupus pocket fighters 1 year 10 months ago +5
@ Navona: Enough. There are videos on YT, the pilot does not need to see the infusion, just to let him know in what perspective is to see the tanker. # Show comment MMaros 1 year 10 months ago 139
@ Navona: Refueling is an operator on board a flying tanker. Read this paragraph: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankowanie_w_powietrzu # System_ze_sztywnym_przewodem # show comment widofmaker 1 year 10 months ago 0
@ CanisLupusLupus: a not so that each of them has a slightly different tasks and stronger (weaker side)? it's like arguing whether ford focus or volvo v50 is a better combo ..... # show comment on .... and 1 year 10 months ago 20
@ CanisLupusLupus: If we're on the F-14 - the reasons why there was not ranked? Out of curiosity, I ask, I realize that looks are not everything. # Show comment CanisLupusLupus 1 year 10 months ago 3
@ Unknown: pocket fighters Bo has already been withdrawn from service in the U.S., and what years in Iran, it's old stuff probably did not upgraded. And certainly not as modern standards. # Show comment Yahoo_ 1 year 10 months ago -4
@ CanisLupusLupus: That you are erratic because you have given the list of T-50, which in the service or not, yet. Actually, you should throw the T-50 and in its place give Tomcat. # Show comment TribalWarrior89 1 year 10 months ago -2
@ CanisLupusLupus: You could write what the "antennae" in front of the Rafale? # Show comment CanisLupusLupus 1 year 10 months ago +5
@ CanisLupusLupus: As a layman, I have a few comments and questions: Ad. Su - 50) wrote about the stealth characteristics. What exactly is known about them, since, as he wrote SuperZaxon, the Russians showed actually just a mock-up plane? pocket fighters Ad. Rafal
close the site uses cookies to deliver services in accordance with the Policy Files Cookies. You can specify the conditions for storage or access cookies on your browser. Wykop.pl excavation (422) Best Microblog
Fulfill this promise made some time ago. I assure you that I have tried to be as objective as possible, although I know that is not the end I succeeded.
Vogels VLB 500 - Speaker bracket - Warsaw Price 79.00 zł
@ Rudy2007: I recently bought on a F-22 but the most difficult to maintain and indeed is difficult to use and I returned pocket fighters to the proven F-16 and we strongly recommend it to everyone, pocket fighters especially well-suited pocket fighters August in urban conditions. # Show comment Koller 1 year 10 months ago 72
@ Koller: why? After all, they are so beautiful on fire .. # show comment g ... t 1 year 10 months ago 4 I recently bought on a F-22 but the most difficult to maintain and indeed is difficult to use and I returned to the proven F-16 and I strongly recommend it to everyone, especially well-suited August in urban conditions. @ Tusk: a lot of smoke? # Show comment b ...... and 1 year 10 months ago 34
@ Tusk: I have tested the F-22, but I definitely prefer my old su-27. Although the equipment smacks of some Soviet inaccuracy but it can take the whole family and even microwave is an invaluable aid for longer trips. # Show comment tusk 1 year 10 months ago via Android 2
@ Duffman: No just the F-22 is not a family tool to spread democracy and it made me reject most of it, and of even these problems in the rain. # Show comment YAZZoo 1 year 10 months ago -2
What this statement at all makes the T-50 since it is what showed Ruthenian arms industry to show a flying mock-up? pocket fighters For this flying scrap yet not developed yet even engines, avionics or weapons? Nay, even the hull is in the demo. If you voted for the bombastic announcements of delusions is Ruthenian generals that Russia was the first power in the world :) And yes dig, because cool pictures. # Show comment CanisLupusLupus 1 year 10 months ago 74
@ SuperZaxon: After I wrote that on the list got on credit. :) And really, I examined each aircraft based on a little bragging manufacturers, pocket fighters pilots, commanders ... Well, after I had the opportunity to fly to every several pocket fighters combat missions. # Show comment Navona 1 year 10 months ago 4
@ CanisLupusLupus: I was looking for the entrance to refuel, but somehow pocket fighters I did not associate :) And what is fueling when the infusion is out of view of the pilot? With the tank too much can not be seen. # Show comment m ........ 1 1 year 10 months ago via iOS 0
@ CanisLupusLupus: interesting question arises in the case of construction of the Chinese. Airforce magazine - theoretically, of course - as it assesses the structure of phenomenal aerodynamic properties, probably much better than the solutions American or Russian. # Show comment CanisLupusLupus pocket fighters 1 year 10 months ago +5
@ Navona: Enough. There are videos on YT, the pilot does not need to see the infusion, just to let him know in what perspective is to see the tanker. # Show comment MMaros 1 year 10 months ago 139
@ Navona: Refueling is an operator on board a flying tanker. Read this paragraph: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankowanie_w_powietrzu # System_ze_sztywnym_przewodem # show comment widofmaker 1 year 10 months ago 0
@ CanisLupusLupus: a not so that each of them has a slightly different tasks and stronger (weaker side)? it's like arguing whether ford focus or volvo v50 is a better combo ..... # show comment on .... and 1 year 10 months ago 20
@ CanisLupusLupus: If we're on the F-14 - the reasons why there was not ranked? Out of curiosity, I ask, I realize that looks are not everything. # Show comment CanisLupusLupus 1 year 10 months ago 3
@ Unknown: pocket fighters Bo has already been withdrawn from service in the U.S., and what years in Iran, it's old stuff probably did not upgraded. And certainly not as modern standards. # Show comment Yahoo_ 1 year 10 months ago -4
@ CanisLupusLupus: That you are erratic because you have given the list of T-50, which in the service or not, yet. Actually, you should throw the T-50 and in its place give Tomcat. # Show comment TribalWarrior89 1 year 10 months ago -2
@ CanisLupusLupus: You could write what the "antennae" in front of the Rafale? # Show comment CanisLupusLupus 1 year 10 months ago +5
@ CanisLupusLupus: As a layman, I have a few comments and questions: Ad. Su - 50) wrote about the stealth characteristics. What exactly is known about them, since, as he wrote SuperZaxon, the Russians showed actually just a mock-up plane? pocket fighters Ad. Rafal
No comments:
Post a Comment